Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33273
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Fernandoen_US
dc.contributor.authorTamminen, Lena-Marien_US
dc.contributor.authorKjosevski, Miroslaven_US
dc.contributor.authorCiaravino, Giovannaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDelpont, Mattiasen_US
dc.contributor.authorCorreia-Gomes, Carlaen_US
dc.contributor.authorvan den Borne, Bart H Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorChantziaras, Iliasen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlarcón, Laura Valeriaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSvennesen, Lineen_US
dc.contributor.authorToppari, Inaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPiccirillo, Alessandraen_US
dc.contributor.authorGecaj, Rreze Men_US
dc.contributor.authorZbikowski, Arturen_US
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Telmoen_US
dc.contributor.authorProdanov-Radulović, Jasnaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Nardi, Marcoen_US
dc.contributor.authorNedosekov, Vitaliien_US
dc.contributor.authorDesvars-Larrive, Amelieen_US
dc.contributor.authorAllepuz, Albertoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-22T12:51:48Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-22T12:51:48Z-
dc.date.issued2025-02-27-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33273-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to identify which biosecurity assessment methods (BAMs) are currently used in practice in animal farms. To address this, a structured questionnaire was developed to gather information such as the animal species, main objectives, type of enforcement, output generated and feedback of the result. In the context of the BETTER Cost Action project, country representatives identified in each of their countries which BAMs were used and completed an online survey. The survey was prepared and translated in 23 languages. Besides a descriptive analysis, clusters of BAMs were determined using a multiple correspondence analysis. Responses, collected between December 2022 and July 2023, included 74 BAMs used in 28 countries. Most of them were used in a single country while three were used in multiple countries. This study provides a comprehensive picture of existing BAMs and insights into their diversity, such as variations in objectives, implementation, evaluators, respondents, feedback, or assessment outputs. Moreover, we identified four BAMs clusters differentiated by their objective, evaluator and type of feedback provided. This study might also represent the basis for future research on strengths and weaknesses of different BAMs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPreventive Veterinary Medicineen_US
dc.titleMethods to assess on-farm biosecurity in Europe and beyonden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106486-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167587725000716?httpAccept=text/xml-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167587725000716?httpAccept=text/plain-
dc.identifier.volume239-
dc.identifier.fpage106486-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Veterinary Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0167587725000716-main.pdf989.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

23
checked on May 3, 2025

Download(s)

1
checked on May 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.