Ве молиме користете го овој идентификатор да го цитирате или поврзете овој запис: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33272
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoya, Sebastianen_US
dc.contributor.authorLamont, Kateen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Marnie Len_US
dc.contributor.authorCiavarino, Giovannaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Mariaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAllepuz, Albertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorTamminen, Lena-Marien_US
dc.contributor.authorCorreia-Gomes, Carlaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Carvalho Ferreira, Helenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDogusan, Mehmet Muraten_US
dc.contributor.authorImperial, Teresaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Meneghi, Danieleen_US
dc.contributor.authorKjosevski, Miroslaven_US
dc.contributor.authorChantziaras, Iliasen_US
dc.contributor.authorBurrell, Alisonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-22T11:30:11Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-22T11:30:11Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-19-
dc.identifier.issn2297-1769-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33272-
dc.description.abstractEffective communication is crucial for strengthening collaboration and ensuring the successful implementation of biosecurity measures against infectious diseases. A collaborative approach, where farmers and veterinarians play a central role in decision-making, may have a greater impact on promoting the implementation of biosecurity practices compared to a top-down approach. The objective of this study was to explore the perspectives of researchers, official services, and industry on the preferred communication methods between farmers and various on-farm stakeholders. Data were collected through four simultaneous focus groups conducted within the framework of the COST Action BETTER project: three involving researchers, and one involving official services and industry people. The data were analyzed using content analysis, which generated three main themes and 13 subthemes: (i) effective methods for communicating biosecurity messages to farmers: direct interaction and practical learning, audio-visual media and support materials, importance of personalization and coordination, and challenges and innovative solutions; (ii) designing an optimal communication system to promote behavioral change in biosecurity: initial strategies for communication: knowledge and trust, integration of technological tools, mandatory programs and coordinated campaigns, continuous training and collaborative learning, and incentives and certifications; and (iii) measuring the success of biosecurity communication programs: evaluation tools and audits, key indicators and benchmarking, measuring attitudes and behavioral changes, and participation and knowledge as additional evaluation metrics. The findings highlight the need for collaborative, personalized, and sustainable approaches to biosecurity communication. This study provides valuable insights to inform the development and implementation of communication programs that remain effective over time.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Veterinary Scienceen_US
dc.titleStakeholders' perspectives on communicating biosecurity to encourage behavior change in farmersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fvets.2025.1562648-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1562648/full-
dc.identifier.volume12-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Veterinary Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fvets-2-1562648.pdf531.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Прикажи едноставен запис

Page view(s)

25
checked on 3.5.2025

Download(s)

1
checked on 3.5.2025

Google ScholarTM

Проверете

Altmetric


Записите во DSpace се заштитени со авторски права, со сите права задржани, освен ако не е поинаку наведено.