Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33130
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRaičević, Branislavaen_US
dc.contributor.authorStević, Ivanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLakić, Draganaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMännik, Agnesen_US
dc.contributor.authorGjorgjievska, Kalinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLabachevski, Bojanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPavlovska, Kristinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorŽunić, Miodragen_US
dc.contributor.authorMilushewa, Petyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPetrova, Guenkaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrega, Dominiken_US
dc.contributor.authorHolko, Przemysławen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanković, Slobodan M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-27T08:57:03Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-27T08:57:03Z-
dc.date.issued2024-11-03-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33130-
dc.description.abstractDrugs for the treatment of obesity show significant effectiveness, but the adverse effects (ADRs) of these drugs are numerous and varied, and some of them are highly cost-generating. Our research aimed to define the health care utilization pattern in treating ADRs of antiobesity therapy, to compare the costs of treating these ADRs among selected European countries, and to identify the key cost drivers. A comparative analysis of the costs of treating the ADRs of antiobesity drugs in 10 European countries (seven EU members and three from the Western Balkans) was conducted, and the impact of parameters of global health expenditures on them was assessed. There are considerable differences in costs of treating adverse antiobesity drug reactions among European countries: costs of treating gastroesophageal reflux disease varied almost 20 times between North Macedonia (12.6 EUR) and Estonia (202.9 EUR). The Gross Domestic Product per capita was an important cost driver in treating the majority of the ADRs studied (p < .001), except for retinopathy, anaphylaxis, and respiratory disorders. The Domestic Private Health Expenditure increased the costs of treating depression (p = .012), upper respiratory tract infection (p = .008), melanocytic naevus (p = .027), and drug-induced hepatitis (p = .023). Investment in pharmaceuticals, medical goods, and preventive care tended to reduce the costs of treating several ADRs, which are seemingly unrelated to the body site or mechanism. Healthcare utilization and costs of treating ADRs to antiobesity drugs vary significantly among European countries. These differences should be considered when creating inputs for cost-effectiveness and budget impact models to decrease their uncertainty.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInforma UK Limiteden_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiotechnology & Biotechnological Equipmenten_US
dc.subjectаnti-obesity drugsen_US
dc.subjectadverse effectsen_US
dc.subjectcostsen_US
dc.subjecteconomic evaluationen_US
dc.titleCosts of treating serious adverse effects of drugs used for treatment of obesity: comparison of selected European countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13102818.2024.2422546-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13102818.2024.2422546-
dc.identifier.volume38-
dc.identifier.issue1-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

46
checked on May 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.