Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33015
Title: Routine Spironolactone in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Authors: Jolly, Sanjit S
d'Entremont, Marc-André
Pitt, Bertram
Lee, Shun Fu
Mian, Rajibul
Tyrwhitt, Jessica
Kedev, Sashko 
Montalescot, Gilles
Cornel, Jan H
Stanković, Goran
Moreno, Raul
Storey, Robert F
Henry, Timothy D
Mehta, Shamir R
Bossard, Matthias
Kala, Petr
Bhindi, Ravinay
Zafirovska, Biljana 
Devereaux, P J
Eikelboom, John
Cairns, John A
Natarajan, Madhu K
Schwalm, J D
Sharma, Sanjib K
Tarhuni, Wadea
Conen, David
Tawadros, Sarah
Lavi, Shahar
Asani, Valon
Topic, Dragan
Cantor, Warren J
Bertrand, Olivier F
Pourdjabbar, Ali
Yusuf, Salim
Issue Date: 13-Feb-2025
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Journal: The New England Journal of Medicine
Abstract: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce mortality in patients after myocardial infarction with congestive heart failure. Whether routine use of spironolactone is beneficial after myocardial infarction is uncertain. Methods In this multicenter trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention to receive either spironolactone or placebo and either colchicine or placebo. The results of the spironolactone trial are reported here. The two primary outcomes were a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure, evaluated as the total number of events; and a composite of the first occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, new or worsening heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Safety was also assessed. Download a PDF of the Research Summary. Results We enrolled 7062 patients at 104 centers in 14 countries; 3537 patients were assigned to receive spironolactone and 3525 to receive placebo. At the time of our analyses, the vital status was unknown for 45 patients (0.6%). For the first primary outcome, there were 183 events (1.7 per 100 patient-years) in the spironolactone group as compared with 220 events (2.1 per 100 patient-years) in the placebo group over a median follow-up period of 3 years (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk of death from noncardiovascular causes, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 1.21; P=0.51). With respect to the second primary outcome, an event occurred in 280 of 3537 patients (7.9%) in the spironolactone group and 294 of 3525 patients (8.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio adjusted for competing risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.13; P=0.60). Serious adverse events were reported in 255 patients (7.2%) in the spironolactone group and 241 (6.8%) in the placebo group. Conclusions Among patients with myocardial infarction, spironolactone did not reduce the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or new or worsening heart failure or the incidence of a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new or worsening heart failure. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; CLEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03048825.)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/33015
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2405923
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

12
checked on May 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.