Ве молиме користете го овој идентификатор да го цитирате или поврзете овој запис: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/31933
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoxha, Bukurijeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSHesho, Igoren_US
dc.contributor.authorFilkoski, Ristoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-02T21:58:30Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-02T21:58:30Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-21-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/31933-
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>Among the current challenges facing the energy sector is finding environmentally friendly and high-performance forms of energy generation. One such form of energy generation is from the wind. In addition to the fluctuations that cause changes in the generated energy, another factor that significantly affects the overall efficiency of wind farms is the distance between the turbines. In that context, a distance of at least three diameters (3D) onwards is necessary to enable a stable operation. This is more difficult to implement for mountainous terrain due to the terrain configuration’s influence, the turbine units’ positioning, and the mutual influence resulting from their position in the area under consideration. This work investigates the interdependence of the terrain features, the placement of ten turbines in different scenarios, and the impact on the overall efficiency of the wind farm. The place where the wind farm is considered is in Koznica, a mountainous area near Prishtina. An analysis has been carried out for two-diameter (2D), three-diameter (3D), and five-diameter (5D) turbine blade spacing for turbines with a rated power of 3.4 MW. The study considers placement in the following forms: Arc, I, L, M, and V. The results show that for 2D distance layout, the capacity factors for Arc, I, L, M, and V placements have the values: 32.9%, 29.8%, 31.1%, 30.6%, and 37.1%. For the 3D distance, according to these scenarios, the capacity factor values are: 29.9%, 30.8%, 30.4%, 29.3%, and 35.6%. For the longest distance, 5D, the capacity factor values are: 28.9%, 29.9%, 29.4%, 27.6%, and 30.6%. The value of the capacity factor for an optimal layout; is achieved at 39.3%.</jats:p>en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectwind energy, Weibull distribution, bivariate probability density functionen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of Wind Turbine Distances Using a Novel Techno-Spatial Approach in Complex Wind Farm Terrainsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su142013688-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13688/pdf-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue20-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Mechanical Engineering-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Mechanical Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Mechanical Engineering: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
sustainability-14-13688.pdf5.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Прикажи едноставен запис

Page view(s)

30
checked on 3.5.2025

Download(s)

1
checked on 3.5.2025

Google ScholarTM

Проверете

Altmetric


Записите во DSpace се заштитени со авторски права, со сите права задржани, освен ако не е поинаку наведено.