Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/31604
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKalabakov, Stefanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJovanovski, Borcheen_US
dc.contributor.authorDenkovski, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorRakovic, Valentinen_US
dc.contributor.authorPfitzner, Bjarneen_US
dc.contributor.authorKonak, Orhanen_US
dc.contributor.authorArnrich, Berten_US
dc.contributor.authorGjoreski, Hristijanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T13:20:00Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-09T13:20:00Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/31604-
dc.description.abstractThe past decade has seen substantial growth in the prevalence and capabilities of wearable devices. For instance, recent human activity recognition (HAR) research has explored using wearable devices in applications such as remote monitoring of patients, detection of gait abnormalities, and cognitive disease identification. However, data collection poses a major challenge in developing HAR systems, especially because of the need to store data at a central location. This raises privacy concerns and makes continuous data collection difficult and expensive due to the high cost of transferring data from a user’s wearable device to a central repository. Considering this, we explore the adoption of federated learning (FL) as a potential solution to address the privacy and cost issues associated with data collection in HAR. More specifically, we investigate the performance and behavioral differences between FL and deep learning (DL) HAR models, under various conditions relevant to real-world deployments. Namely, we explore the differences between the two types of models when (i) using data from different sensor placements, (ii) having access to users with data from heterogeneous sensor placements, (iii) considering bandwidth efficiency, and (iv) dealing with data with incorrect labels. Our results show that FL models suffer from a consistent performance deficit in comparison to their DL counterparts, but achieve these results with much better bandwidth efficiency. Furthermore, we observe that FL models exhibit very similar responses to those of DL models when exposed to data from heterogeneous sensor placements. Finally, we show that the FL models are more robust to data with incorrect labels than their centralized DL counterparts.en_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.titleFederated Learning for Activity Recognition: A System Level Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3289220-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

47
checked on May 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.