Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/31258
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKlauser, Andrea Sabineen_US
dc.contributor.authorStrobl, Sylviaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchwabl, Christophen_US
dc.contributor.authorKremser, Christianen_US
dc.contributor.authorKlotz, Werneren_US
dc.contributor.authorVasilevska Nikodinovska, Violetaen_US
dc.contributor.authorStofferin, Hannesen_US
dc.contributor.authorScharll, Yannicken_US
dc.contributor.authorHalpern, Ethanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-04T12:21:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-04T12:21:21Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/31258-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate two different DECT postprocessing protocols for detection of MSU deposits in foot tendons of cadavers with verification by polarizing light microscopy as gold standard. Material and Methods: A total of 40 embalmed cadavers (15 male; 25 female; median age, 82 years; mean, 80 years; range, 52 - 99; SD ± 10.9) underwent DECT to assess MSU deposits in foot tendons. Two postprocessing DECT protocols with different Hounsfield unit (HU) thresholds 150/500 (=established) versus 120/500 (= modified) HU were applied to dual source acquisition with 80 kV for tube A and 140 kV for tube B. Six fresh cadavers (4 male; 2 female; median age, 78; mean, 78,5; range 61 - 95 ) were examined by DECT. Tendon dissection of 2/6 fresh cadavers with positive DECT 120 and negative DECT 150 studies were used to verify MSU deposits by polarizing light microscopy. Results: The tibialis anterior tendon was found positive in 57.5%/100% (DECT 150/120), peroneus tendon in 35%/100%, achilles tendon in 25%/90%, flexor halluces longus tendon in 10%/100%, and tibialis posterior tendon in 12.5%/97.5%. DECT 120 resulted in increased tendon MSU deposit detection, when DECT 150 was negative, with an overall agreement between DECT 150 and DECT 120 of 80 % (P = 0.013). Polarizing light microscope confirmed MSU deposits detected only by DECT 120 in tibialis anterior, achilles, flexor halluces longus and peroneal tendons. Conclusion: The DECT 120 protocol showed a higher sensitivity when compared to DECT 150.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnosticsen_US
dc.subjectDual-energy computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectgouten_US
dc.subjecttendonen_US
dc.subjectfooten_US
dc.subjectmonosodium urate depositsen_US
dc.titleImpact of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) Postprocessing Protocols in Detection of Monosodium Urate (MSU) Deposits in Foot Tendons of Cadaversen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics13132208-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

13
checked on Oct 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.