Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/31228
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTodevski, Dejanen_US
dc.contributor.authorDimitrievska, Deskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorZdraveska, Marijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorIsmaili, Irfanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTatabitovska, Aleksandraen_US
dc.contributor.authorStoshevski, Bojanen_US
dc.contributor.authorBogdanovska Todorovska, Magdalenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorOgnenoska Jankoska, Biljanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVince Zdraveska, Teodoraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T12:23:51Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-02T12:23:51Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationTodevski D, Dimitrievska D, Zdraveska M, Ismaili I, Tatabitovska A, Stoshevski B, Bogdanovska Todorovska M, Zdraveska T.V., Role of Cytology and Cytoblock in Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusions. Mak Med Pregled 2023; 77(2): 78-83en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/31228-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Pleural effusion is a common compli-cation of malignant diseases and its precise diagnosis is an important factor for staging and optimizing the treatment of a patient. The aim of this study was to de-termine the diagnostic value of cytology and cytoblock in the detection of malignant pleural effusion in patients with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary neoplasms. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study from January 2022 to March 2023 with retrospective approach. We included 92 patients with malignant diseases re-ferred to our Clinic of Pulmonology for diagnosis of their new-onset pleural effusion. We analyzed their medical history, pathohistology of the primary tumor and cytology results from cytospin and cytoblock pre-paration from their pleural effusions samples Results. Of the 92 included patients, positive cytology (classification group IV and V) was obtained in 31 (33.69%), negative (group I and II) in 57 (61.95%) and group III in 4 patients (4.34%). Positive cytology was obtained in 17 patients (54.83%) with pulmonary neo-plasms, 11(35.48%) with extra-pulmonary neoplasms and 3(9.67%) neoplasms with undefined etiology. Com-paration of the results from cytoblock and cytospin preparations showed that the diagnostic yield of cy-toblock was greater that cytospin preparation. The results from cytoblock were compatible with the pathohistology result from the primary neoplasm in 88.46% of patients. Conclusion. Cytology and cytoblock obtained from pleural effusion could be valid diagnostic procedures, especially in patients with advanced malignant disease who are not candidates for more invasive diagnostic procedures.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherМакедонско лекарско друштво = Macedonian medical associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofМакедонски медицински преглед = Macedonian medical reviewen_US
dc.subjectpleural effusionen_US
dc.subjectsensitivityen_US
dc.subjectmalignant diseasesen_US
dc.subjectcytopathologyen_US
dc.titleRole of Cytology and Cytoblock in Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusionsen_US
dc.title.alternativeУЛОГАТА НА ЦИТОЛОГИЈАТА И КЛЕТОЧНИОТ БЛОК ВО ДИЈАГНОЗАТА НА МАЛИГНИТЕ ПЛЕВРАЛЕН ИЗЛИВИen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Makedonski Medicinski Pregled ...pdf3.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

45
checked on May 3, 2025

Download(s)

16
checked on May 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.