Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/29305
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCamporese, Giuseppeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSimioni, Paoloen_US
dc.contributor.authorDi Micco, Pierpaoloen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Capitán, Carmenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRivas, Agustinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFont, Carmeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSahuquillo, Joan Carlesen_US
dc.contributor.authorVillares, Paulaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrandoni, Paoloen_US
dc.contributor.authorMonreal, Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorRIETE Investigatorsen_US
dc.contributor.authorBosevski, Marijanen_US
dc.contributor.authorZdraveska, Marijaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-13T13:43:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-13T13:43:37Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/29305-
dc.description.abstractEdoxaban is used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment. Real-life data are lacking about its use in long-term therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy and the safety of edoxaban for long-term VTE treatment in a real-life setting. Patients with VTE included in the Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry, receiving edoxaban 60 or 30 mg daily were prospectively followed up to validate the benefit of using different dosages. The main outcome was the composite of VTE recurrences or major bleeding in patients with or without criteria for dose reduction. Multivariable analysis to identify predictors for the composite outcome was performed. From October 2015 to November 2019, 562 patients received edoxaban for long-term therapy. Most (94%) of the 416 patients not meeting criteria for dose reduction received 60 mg daily, and 92 patients meeting criteria (63%) received 30 mg daily. During treatment, two patients developed recurrent VTE, six had major bleeding and nine died (2 from fatal bleeding). Among patients not meeting criteria for dose reduction, those receiving 30 mg daily had a higher rate of the composite event (hazard ratio (HR) 8.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-42.4) and a significant higher mortality rate (HR 31.1; 95% CI 4.63-262) than those receiving 60 mg. Among patients meeting criteria for dose reduction, those receiving 60 mg daily had no events, and a nonsignificantly higher mortality rate (HR 5.04; 95% CI 0.54-133) than those receiving 30 mg daily. In conclusion, edoxaban seems to be effective and safe for long-term VTE treatment in real life. Criteria for dose reduction should be reformulated.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Translational Scienceen_US
dc.titleEdoxaban for the Long-Term Therapy of Venous Thromboembolism: Should the Criteria for Dose Reduction be Revised?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cts.12876-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cts.12876-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1111/cts.12876-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cts.12876-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.fpage335-
dc.identifier.lpage342-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on May 4, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.