Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/29185
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorA. Maurizoten_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Bura-Rivièreen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Gritlien_US
dc.contributor.authorL. Bertolettien_US
dc.contributor.authorL. Hernández-Blascoen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Ciammaichellaen_US
dc.contributor.authorM.C. Díaz-Pedrocheen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Alfonsoen_US
dc.contributor.authorM.A. Lorenteen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Monreal and the RIETE Investigatorsen_US
dc.contributor.authorBosevski Men_US
dc.contributor.authorZdraveska Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T11:27:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-07T11:27:29Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationA. Maurizot, A. Bura-Rivière, K. Gritli, L. Bertoletti, L. Hernández-Blasco, M. Ciammaichella, M.C. Díaz-Pedroche, M. Alfonso, M.A. Lorente, M. Monreal, Comparaison en France, en Italie et en Espagne des modalités de prise en charge de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse, JMV-Journal de Médecine Vasculaire, Volume 42, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 6-13,en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/29185-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Many national and international guidelines have been established for venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Homogeneous management practices could be expected in the different European countries. To verify this hypothesis, we compared practices in France, Italy and Spain. Method: We used data from the international RIETE registry to compare VTE management between France, Italy and Spain. Results: From 2001 January to 2011 January, patients were consecutively included in France (n=1548), Italy (n=2083) and Spain (29,824). All patients received anticoagulant treatment. Low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the most frequently used drug as initial therapy in all three countries, but unfractionated heparin (UFH) was more frequently used in France and Italy than in Spain. In France, the proportion of patients receiving LMWH was lower than the proportion of patients with active cancer (cancer 22.5 %, long-term treatment with LMWH 17.4 %). A vena cava filter was significantly more frequently used in France (5.5 % in France, 3.2 % in Italy and 2 % in Spain, P<0.0001). High bleeding risk because of surgery with recent thromboembolic disease was the most frequent indication in France and Italy for vena cava filter placement (36.4 %, and 31.3 %, respectively). Conclusion: Despite the publication of national and international guidelines, VTE management differs among the three major European countries included in the RIETE registry, France, Italy and Spain.en_US
dc.language.isofren_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal de Médecine Vasculaireen_US
dc.titleComparaison en France, en Italie et en Espagne des modalités de prise en charge de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse,en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdmv.2017.01.002-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

29
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.