Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/28933
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAvramovska, Majaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaranfilski, Borislaven_US
dc.contributor.authorDimitrov, Goranen_US
dc.contributor.authorTofoski, Gligoren_US
dc.contributor.authorDzikova, Elenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaneva Markova, Anaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHadji Lega, Marijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSotiroski, Kostaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVaskova, Olivijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSikole, Aleksandaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-26T07:29:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-26T07:29:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/28933-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study determined urine iodine concentration (UIC) during gestation, assessed the maternal iodine nutrition status and correlated it with gestational age at birth (GAB) and birth weight (BW).The measurement of UIC provides the best single measurement of the iodine nutritional status in population. Objective: Determination of UIC in pregnant women in North Macedonia. Methods: This prospective study assessed the iodine nutrition status during the course of pregnancy with reference of median UIC among 364 healthy pregnant women in different gestational age (in trimester and 5-week intervals). Results: The overall and the 1st to the 3rd trimester median UIC were: 183.7, 207, 189.75 and 169.28 [μg/L], respectively. The median UIC (μg/L) results according to 5-week interval in advancing gestation were: 232.34, 200.13, 152.81, 194.39, 181.28, 160.28, 169.41 and 175.24, respectively. We detected 5.22% (19/364) and 74.72% (272/364) with the median UIC < 50 μg/L and UIC ≥ 100 μg/L, respectively. In multiple regression, the median UIC (β = 0.0000767, P = 0.929) had no statistically significant prediction to the GAB. Disease prevalence results for mean UIC in detecting BW had no statistical significance: area under curve (AUC) = 0.521, z-statistic (0.340), sensitivity (45.83%), specificity (66.27%), predictive (6.59%) and P value (0.734). Conclusion: Iodine status of pregnant women in our study is generally sufficient by World Health Organization recommendations. The median UIC in each trimester and 5-week interval has statistically insignificant decrease in accordance to the advancing gestation. The median UIC has no significance in predicting GAB and BW.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCroatian Academy of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Med Croaticaen_US
dc.subjectpregnancyen_US
dc.subjecturinary iodine concentrationen_US
dc.subjectiodine nutritional statusen_US
dc.subjectbirth weighten_US
dc.subjectgestational age at birthen_US
dc.subjectthyroid metabolismen_US
dc.titleURINARY IODINE CONCENTRATION: PREDICTOR OF BIRTH WEIGHT OR BIOMARKER FOR ASSESSING THE IODINE STATUS IN HEALTHY PREGNANT WOMEN, ONLY?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AMC_74_3_str_211_221 (3).pdf1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

70
checked on May 4, 2025

Download(s)

12
checked on May 4, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.