Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNatali Rajčinovska Pavleskaen_US
dc.descriptionProfessional articleen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to provide insight into several relevant works of prominent researchers who challenge the term ‘contemporary’ trying to understand the time in which we live and the time in which we create. By presenting a comparative study of texts, this article seeks to understand the concept of time and shape (of representation/manifestation) in the context of contemporariness. from different points of view regardless of the perspective chosen in art or philosophy, etc. As a linguistic form, the term ‘contemporary art’ originates from the 20th century. However, in terms of its meaning, art has always been ‘contemporary’ at the time in which it was generated. We can only observe the works of the past as artefacts, with a contemporary point of view, trying to put them in the right place today.en_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Macedonian Literature at Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopjeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCONTEXT 21 Review for Comparative Literature and Cultural Researchen_US
dc.subjectcontemporariness, temporality, art, history, transformation, hybridityen_US
dc.titleContemporariness in Theory as a Historically Problematic Categoryen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doiУДК 7.01:115-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Fine Arts: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Natali Rajčinovska Pavleska, Contemporariness in Theory as a Historically Problematic.pdfProfessional article4.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

checked on Jun 15, 2024


checked on Jun 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.