Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/27858
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAsp, Juliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSkov, Vibeen_US
dc.contributor.authorBellosillo, Beatrizen_US
dc.contributor.authorKristensen, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorLippert, Ericen_US
dc.contributor.authorDicker, Franken_US
dc.contributor.authorSchwarz, Jirien_US
dc.contributor.authorWojtaszewska, Marzenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPalmqvist, Larsen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkiki, Susannaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAggerholm, Annien_US
dc.contributor.authorTolstrup Andersen, Mortenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGirodon, Françoisen_US
dc.contributor.authorKjær, Lasseen_US
dc.contributor.authorOppliger Leibundgut, Elisabethen_US
dc.contributor.authorPancrazzi, Alessandroen_US
dc.contributor.authorVorland, Martaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrikovics, Hajnalkaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKralovics, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorCassinat, Brunoen_US
dc.contributor.authorCoucelo, Margaridaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEftimov, Aleksandaren_US
dc.contributor.authorHaslam, Karlen_US
dc.contributor.authorKusec, Rajkoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLink-Lenczowska, Dorotaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLodé, Laurenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatiakowska, Karolinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaguib, Dinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNavaglia, Filippoen_US
dc.contributor.authorNovotny, Guy Wayneen_US
dc.contributor.authorPercy, Melanie Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorSudarikov, Andreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorHermouet, Sylvieen_US
dc.contributor.authorPallisgaard, Nielsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T07:46:57Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-07T07:46:57Z-
dc.date.issued2019-05-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/27858-
dc.description.abstractExternal quality assurance (EQA) programs are vital to ensure high quality and standardized results in molecular diagnostics. It is important that EQA for quantitative analysis takes into account the variation in methodology. Results cannot be expected to be more accurate than limits of the technology used, and it is essential to recognize factors causing substantial outlier results. The present study aimed to identify parameters of specific importance for JAK2 V617F quantification by quantitative PCR, using different starting materials, assays, and technical platforms. Sixteen samples were issued to participating laboratories in two EQA rounds. In the first round, 19 laboratories from 11 European countries analyzing JAK2 V617F as part of their routine diagnostics returned results from in-house assays. In the second round, 25 laboratories from 17 countries participated. Despite variations in starting material, assay set-up and instrumentation the laboratories were generally well aligned in the EQA program. However, EQA based on a single technology appears to be a valuable tool to achieve standardization of the quantification of JAK2 V617F allelic burden.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of hematologyen_US
dc.titleInternational external quality assurance of JAK2 V617F quantificationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00277-018-3570-8-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00277-018-3570-8.pdf-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-018-3570-8/fulltext.html-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00277-018-3570-8.pdf-
dc.identifier.volume98-
dc.identifier.issue5-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on May 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.