Ве молиме користете го овој идентификатор да го цитирате или поврзете овој запис: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/26412
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAleksandra Gavrilovska Brzanoven_US
dc.contributor.authorSkender Seidien_US
dc.contributor.authorSotir Stavridisen_US
dc.contributor.authorOgnen Ivanovskien_US
dc.contributor.authorJosif Janchuleven_US
dc.contributor.authorViktor Stankoven_US
dc.contributor.authorMarija Jovanovski Srcevaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBiljana Kuzmanovskaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-02T08:50:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-02T08:50:19Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/26412-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Bladder tumors are identified and treated using a surgical procedure called as transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TUR-BT). During TUR-BT resection, stimulation of the obturator nerve may cause violent adductor muscle spasms. The “obturator reflex,” as this disorder is known, generally causes the legs to move inadvertently (leg jerking). Since this condition can cause several complications, it is preferable to avoid it. Objective: In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia combined with obturator nerve block or general anesthetic without muscle relaxant in preventing adductor muscle spasm during TUR-BT procedures. Methods: Forty consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective observational evaluation and divided into two groups. Patients in Group I underwent spinal anesthesia along with an obturator nerve block, while those in Group II underwent general anesthesia without a neuromuscular relaxant. The following details were recorded: time for obturator block performance, the severity of the motor blockade, the length of the procedure in both groups because a probable adductor spasm might make it more difficult. The level of the surgeon’s pleasure was noted throughout the surgery. Additionally, the patient’s satisfaction and any issues that may have arisen were documented (the incidence of vascular puncture, hematoma, nerve damage, and visceral injury was noted). Results: Block performance time in Group I was 4.8±0.5 minutes, whereas it was 5.0±0.3 minutes in Group II. The ease of access for the two groups was the same. Group I demonstrated increased patient and surgeon satisfaction with a general anesthesia without neuromuscular relaxants and an obturatorius nerve block. Mean surgical time did not differ between the groups.There were no complications in either group. Conclusion: During such operations, routine use of ONB in combination with spinal anaesthetic or general anesthetic without a neuromuscular blocker can enhance oncological outcomes for patients, reduce complication rates, and extend the period of time spent living without diseaseen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCOPEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Archivesen_US
dc.subjectobturator nerve blocken_US
dc.subjecttransurethral resection of bladder tumoren_US
dc.subjectspinal anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectgeneral anesthesia.en_US
dc.titleObturator Nerve Block for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/medarh.2023.77.118-122-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Опис SizeFormat 
Med arch Obturatorius.pdf201.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Прикажи едноставен запис

Page view(s)

92
checked on 4.5.2025

Download(s)

35
checked on 4.5.2025

Google ScholarTM

Проверете

Altmetric


Записите во DSpace се заштитени со авторски права, со сите права задржани, освен ако не е поинаку наведено.