Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/24540
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSalkoski, Rasimen_US
dc.contributor.authorChorbev, Ivanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-23T09:42:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-23T09:42:45Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/24540-
dc.description.abstractDifferential Evolution (DE) is one of the most popular evolutionary optimization technique on continuous domains based on simplicity, effectiveness and robustness. The weighting factor(F) and crossover constant(CR) allows the construction of a new trial element based on the current and mutant elements. The crossover constant controls which and how many components are mutated in each element of the current population. The work in the present paper aims to analyze the impact the weighting factor and the crossover constant, has on the behavior of DE. The influence of the crossover constant on the distribution of the number of mutated components and on the probability for a component to be taken from mutant vector (mutation probability) is analyzed for several variants of weighting factor and crossover factor, including classical binomial and exponential strategies. For each weighting and crossover variant the relationship between the crossover and mutation probability is identified and its impact on the choice and adaptation of control parameters is analyzed numerically and graphically. Ten different strategies (variations) of DE with penalty function approach are analyzed with various population sizes, crossover and weighting factors and applied to the problem of minimizing the cost of the active parts of the power objects. Constraints resulting from international specifications are taken into account. The Objective functions that are optimized are minimizations dependent on multiple input variables. All constraints are normalized and modeled as inequalities.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofICT Innovations 2018, Web Proceedingsen_US
dc.subjectOptimization methods · Differential evolution · Weighting factor · Crossover constant · Binomial crossover · Exponential crossover · Distribution transformeren_US
dc.titleInfluence of Weighting factor and Crossover constant on the behavior of Differential Evolution Algorithms with a Penalty Function approachen_US
dc.typeProceedingsen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Jul 22, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Jul 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.