Accreditation from a positive leadership perspective
Date Issued
2022
Author(s)
Abstract
When lab staff is alone—no management or official representatives in sight—one of the things they complain about the
most is accreditation. At worst, we consider it a huge waste of time and effort. It’s not that we don’t see the benefits of
accreditation. We do. But we find that these returns do not satisfy us and are definitely not worth the costs associated
with the process.
So if accreditation is unlikely to go away, is it possible to make lemonade out of this lemon and create a more positive
outcome from what appears to be long-lasting,exhausting and sometimes boring process?
House cleaning
If we take the perspective, “If we have to do it anyway, how can we make it better? we could start by saying that accred-
itation gives us a rather rare opportunity to do some cleaning in the labs. By forcing us to regularly review our policies
and procedures and the staffing of various tasks in our laboratories, we have an externally imposed reason to engage in
a process that can lead to internally beneficial outcomes.
Become proactive
Just as we have learned to be more proactive when we conduct laboratory evaluations—not only evaluating past per-
17
formance, but also building on the past to set goals for the future—accreditation can help us become more proactive.
Accreditation offers us a regular opportunity to ask ourselves where we want to go based on where we have already been.
It gives us a chance to plan systematically by looking at our best practices and comparing our current results with those
of the past.
Meeting the enemy
We are the ones who vote to approve, adopt or accept the standards. We may have met the enemy - and that is us. If
some of us who feel constrained by outdated standards and processes used by accrediting agencies were a little more
open in our meetings about why accreditation often hurts us more than it helps, maybe we could start to initiate some
change. If we don’t succeed, at least we wouldn’t be worse off than we are now.
most is accreditation. At worst, we consider it a huge waste of time and effort. It’s not that we don’t see the benefits of
accreditation. We do. But we find that these returns do not satisfy us and are definitely not worth the costs associated
with the process.
So if accreditation is unlikely to go away, is it possible to make lemonade out of this lemon and create a more positive
outcome from what appears to be long-lasting,exhausting and sometimes boring process?
House cleaning
If we take the perspective, “If we have to do it anyway, how can we make it better? we could start by saying that accred-
itation gives us a rather rare opportunity to do some cleaning in the labs. By forcing us to regularly review our policies
and procedures and the staffing of various tasks in our laboratories, we have an externally imposed reason to engage in
a process that can lead to internally beneficial outcomes.
Become proactive
Just as we have learned to be more proactive when we conduct laboratory evaluations—not only evaluating past per-
17
formance, but also building on the past to set goals for the future—accreditation can help us become more proactive.
Accreditation offers us a regular opportunity to ask ourselves where we want to go based on where we have already been.
It gives us a chance to plan systematically by looking at our best practices and comparing our current results with those
of the past.
Meeting the enemy
We are the ones who vote to approve, adopt or accept the standards. We may have met the enemy - and that is us. If
some of us who feel constrained by outdated standards and processes used by accrediting agencies were a little more
open in our meetings about why accreditation often hurts us more than it helps, maybe we could start to initiate some
change. If we don’t succeed, at least we wouldn’t be worse off than we are now.
Subjects
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
LM4MS_ABSTRACTS.pdf
Size
2.71 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):e4774d1cd4ffe1ac55a2689098444005