Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/24123
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZdravkova, Katerinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T09:32:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T09:32:13Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/24123-
dc.description.abstractGhostwriting became students’ most popular way to avoid writing of boring essays, or the best way to easily earn by writing on behalf of another student. This paper presents several markers indicating a presence of potential ghostwriters. Proposed methodology suggests various inspection techniques, which do not prove anything in isolation. Whenever they are jointly implemented, they successfully cluster the essays, suggesting plausible absence, potential and almost certain presence of one or few ghostwriters. After the initial clustering, all the papers go through subtle linguistic check. In our sample, later approach discovered some unexpected phrases which confirmed the presence of the same ghostwriters not only in the current, but also in the previous generations.en_US
dc.publisherInstitut »Jožef Stefan«, Ljubljanaen_US
dc.titleFifty ways to detect a ghostwriteren_US
dc.typeProceeding articleen_US
dc.relation.conference15th International multiconference Information Society 2011en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering: Conference papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FIFTY_WAYS_TO_DETECT_A_GHOSTWRITER.pdf87.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

33
checked on May 22, 2024

Download(s)

18
checked on May 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.