Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/23318
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSpirov, Goranen_US
dc.contributor.authorBeshliev, Simonen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatveeva, Nikien_US
dc.contributor.authorUgrinska, Anaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSpirov, Vasilchoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-06T07:59:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-06T07:59:23Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-22-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/23318-
dc.description.abstractImaging is vital in the follow-up strategy of patients with colorectal cancer. Computed tomography is widely accepted as a method of choice, but further work up is required when equivocal findings are present. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) as a problem-solving tool of dubious CT findings in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in the follow-up period. This was a retrospective review of thirty-two patients referred for 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging due to suspicion of recurrent disease solely based on CT exam. The diagnosis of a malignancy lesion was based on intensity of the lesion, location, shape, size, as well as CT findings. There was a follow-up period of at least six months after the PET/CT examination. The most common site of detected lesions that could not be characterized by CT were the lungs (13/32; 40.5%), followed by liver (8/32, 25%) and lymph nodes (5/32, 15.6%). Additionally, lesions were reported at adrenal gland, spleen, peritoneum, ovary and at surgical site. In almost half of the patients (15/32; 46.8%) lesions were detected by PET/CT and characterized as disease recurrence. Metastases at additional site were detected in five patients (6/15, 40%). In the follow-up period recurrent disease was detected in two patients (2/32, 6.2%) with negative PET/CT findings. Only one person had a false positive finding. The overall positive and negative predictive value of FDG-PET/CT was 93.3% and 84.6% respectively. PET/CT offers a high overall positive and negative predictive value in distinguishing CRC metastasis. Furthermore, it exceeds CT performance in detecting extrahepatic recurrent disease.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMacedonian Association of Anatomistsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Morphological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectPET scanen_US
dc.subjectCT scanen_US
dc.subjectimagingen_US
dc.subjectcolorectal canceren_US
dc.title18F-FDG PET/CT IN DIFFERENTIATING EQUIVOCAL CT LESIONS IN PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL CANCERen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.55302/jms2251001s-
dc.identifier.volume5-
dc.identifier.issue1-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
318-1-1680-2-10-20220512.pdf237.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

68
checked on May 1, 2024

Download(s)

12
checked on May 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.