Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/23153
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMitreski, Nenaden_US
dc.contributor.authorSmichkoska, Snezhanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrozdanovska, Biljanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorStojkovski, Igoren_US
dc.contributor.authorKlisarovska, Violetaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLazarova, Emilijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAtevik, Aleksandaren_US
dc.contributor.authorMitreska, Biljanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorIljovska, Marinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-28T09:20:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-28T09:20:55Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/23153-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Adjuvant radiochemotherapy is a standard treatment in patients with surgically treated stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma who did not undergo neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was only marginally investigated in postoperative setting. Material and methods: A longitudinal observational analysis was conducted in patients with radically resected stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma treated with IMRT at the University Clinic for Radiotherapy and Oncology as part of the adjuvant postoperative treatment. The dose-volume parameters of the radiotherapy plans, as well as acute side effects of 40 patients were analyzed. Results: The average dose received by the target volume was 49.95 Gy (range 27-54 Gy). The mean volume of peritoneal cavity receiving 45 Gy (V45) was 102.73 cm3 (±52.10), V30 for pelvic bones was 38.3% (±5.48), V40 for bladder 52.48% (±10.9). The most frequent acute side effects were diarrhea in 17 (42.5%), lymphopenia in 34 (85%) and thrombocytopenia in 26 patients (65%). Most of the side effects were self-limiting and caused disruption of the radiation treatment only in 3 patients (7.5%). Conclusion: Integrating IMRT in the adjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer provides a good dose distribution and organs at risk sparing. The treatment is well tolerated, the side effects are mainly of lesser degrees and easily managed. A prospective trial comparing IMRT with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is needed to assess whether IMRT offers a better perspective for adjuvant treatment. Keywords: rectal adenocarcinoma, adjuvant treatment, remove adjuvant treatment, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, acute side effectsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Medicine, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Skopjeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAcademic Medical Journalen_US
dc.subjectrectal adenocarcinomaen_US
dc.subjectadjuvant treatmenten_US
dc.subjectremove adjuvant treatmenten_US
dc.subjectintensity-modulated radiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectacute side effectsen_US
dc.titlePOSTOPERATIVE ADJUVANT INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR RADICALLY RESECTED RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA: DATA FROM EVERYDAY PRACTICEen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.53582/AMJ2221099m-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
86-Text-355-1-10-20220624 (1).pdf417.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

78
checked on Oct 11, 2024

Download(s)

13
checked on Oct 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.