Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/21591| Title: | Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial | Authors: | Aminian, Adel Sgueglia, Gregory A Wiemer, Marcus Kefer, Joëlle Gasparini, Gabriele L Ruzsa, Zoltan van Leeuwen, Maarten A H Ungureanu, Claudiu Leibundgut, Gregor Vandeloo, Bert Kedev, Sashko Bernat, Ivo Ratib, Karim Iglesias, Juan F Al Hage, Elias Posteraro, Giuseppe A Pascut, Dan Maes, Frederic Regazzoli, Damiano Kakonyi, Kornél Meijers, Thomas A Colletti, Giuseppe Krivoshei, Lian Lochy, Stijn Zafirovska, Biljana Horák, David Nolan, James Degrauwe, Sophie Tobita, Kazuki Saito, Shigeru |
Issue Date: | 2022 | Publisher: | Elsevier BV | Journal: | JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions | Abstract: | Currently, transradial access (TRA) is the recommended access for coronary procedures because of increased safety, with radial artery occlusion (RAO) being its most frequent complication, which will increasingly affect patients undergoing multiple procedures during their lifetimes. Recently, distal radial access (DRA) has emerged as a promising alternative access to minimize RAO risk. A large-scale, international, randomized trial comparing RAO with TRA and DRA is lacking. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/21591 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032 |
| Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles |
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.