Evaluation methodology for national enterprise architecture frameworks
Date Issued
2010-09
Author(s)
Kiroski, Kiril
Abstract
This article introduces a new methodology for NEA (National
Enterprise Architecture) evaluation based on two sets of indicators. The first set
consists of quantitative indicators regarding to the e-government initiatives and
their characteristics, including interoperability strategy, NEA strategy, legal
framework and legislatives, sustainability, quality control, dissemination and
predicted goals. The second set is based on the definition of NEA and NEA
characteristics, consisting of the following quantitative indicators: methodology
and models, model interfaces, architectural standards and principles, repository
and use of development indicator. The final result of the evaluation is calculated
as a sum of the results of the both sets of indicators.
In this paper we analyze how similar efforts resulted in smaller methodology
and evaluate several NEA initiatives with comparison of results. Further we
comment how our approach results in a new sophistication methodology that
can be used to evaluate NEA initiatives and help others in giving directions to
build new sophisticated solutions.
Enterprise Architecture) evaluation based on two sets of indicators. The first set
consists of quantitative indicators regarding to the e-government initiatives and
their characteristics, including interoperability strategy, NEA strategy, legal
framework and legislatives, sustainability, quality control, dissemination and
predicted goals. The second set is based on the definition of NEA and NEA
characteristics, consisting of the following quantitative indicators: methodology
and models, model interfaces, architectural standards and principles, repository
and use of development indicator. The final result of the evaluation is calculated
as a sum of the results of the both sets of indicators.
In this paper we analyze how similar efforts resulted in smaller methodology
and evaluate several NEA initiatives with comparison of results. Further we
comment how our approach results in a new sophistication methodology that
can be used to evaluate NEA initiatives and help others in giving directions to
build new sophisticated solutions.
Subjects
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
10.1.1.369.9271.pdf
Size
7.13 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):9d0e5bb541d02faebf25ddc9889080e9