Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/17865
Title: External quality assessment of Rift Valley fever diagnosis in 17 veterinary laboratories of the Mediterranean and Black Sea regions
Authors: Pérez-Ramírez, Elisa
Cano-Gómez, Cristina
Llorente, Francisco
Adzic, Bojan
Al Ameer, Maisa
Djadjovski, Igor
El Hage, Jeanne
El Mellouli, Fatiha
Goletic, Teufik
Hovsepyan, Hermine
Karayel-Hacioglu, Ilke
Maksimovic Zoric, Jelena
Mejri, Selma
Sadaoui, Hassiba
Salem, Sayed Hassan
Sherifi, Kurtesh
Toklikishvili, Natela
Vodica, Ani
Monaco, Federica
Brun, Alejandro
Jiménez-Clavero, Miguel Ángel
Fernández-Pinero, Jovita
Dzadzovski, Igor 
Issue Date: 28-Sep-2020
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Journal: PloS one
Abstract: Rift Valley fever (RVF) is an arboviral zoonosis that primarily affects ruminants but can also cause illness in humans. The increasing impact of RVF in Africa and Middle East and the risk of expansion to other areas such as Europe, where competent mosquitos are already established, require the implementation of efficient surveillance programs in animal populations. For that, it is pivotal to regularly assess the performance of existing diagnostic tests and to evaluate the capacity of veterinary labs of endemic and non-endemic countries to detect the infection in an accurate and timely manner. In this context, the animal virology network of the MediLabSecure project organized between October 2016 and March 2017 an external quality assessment (EQA) to evaluate the RVF diagnostic capacities of beneficiary veterinary labs. This EQA was conceived as the last step of a training curriculum that included 2 diagnostic workshops that were organized by INIA-CISA (Spain) in 2015 and 2016. Seventeen veterinary diagnostic labs from 17 countries in the Mediterranean and Black Sea regions participated in this EQA. The exercise consisted of two panels of samples for molecular and serological detection of the virus. The laboratories were also provided with positive controls and all the kits and reagents necessary to perform the recommended diagnostic techniques. All the labs were able to apply the different protocols and to provide the results on time. The performance was good in the molecular panel with 70.6% of participants reporting 100% correct results, and excellent in the serological panel with 100% correct results reported by 94.1% of the labs. This EQA provided a good overview of the RVFV diagnostic capacities of the involved labs and demonstrated that most of them were able to correctly identify the virus genome and antibodies in different animal samples.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/17865
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239478
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Veterinary Medicine: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EXTERN~1.PDF1.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

43
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Download(s)

3
checked on Apr 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.