Ве молиме користете го овој идентификатор да го цитирате или поврзете овој запис: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/17531
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTomasevic, Igoren_US
dc.contributor.authorKovačević, Danijela Bursaćen_US
dc.contributor.authorJambrak, Anet Režeken_US
dc.contributor.authorZsolt, Szendrően_US
dc.contributor.authorDalle Zotte, Antonellaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartinović, Aleksandraen_US
dc.contributor.authorProdanov, Mirkoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSołowiej, Bartoszen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirbu, Alexandrinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSubić, Jonelen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoljević, Svetlanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSemenova, Anastasiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKročko, Miroen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuckova, Vieraen_US
dc.contributor.authorGetya, Andriyen_US
dc.contributor.authorKravchenko, Oksanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDjekic, Ilijaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T10:19:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-05T10:19:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/17531-
dc.description.abstractThis investigation provides an important insight into the Central and Eastern European food industry, beyond traditional food safety management and reflects on its food safety (FS) climate or the human route of its FS culture. Investigation was conducted in 10 Central and Eastern European countries involving more than 500 food companies. Overall FS climate was assessed as good. The availability of infrastructure was perceived the same in all countries although “resources” was the lowest scored climate component. Uncertainty avoiding national cultures had a stronger preference towards written FS procedures and instructions. FS climate was better assessed in bigger companies because small companies observed weaker availability of resources, smaller number of procedures and instructions and reduced risk awareness. FS communication and commitment were not affected by company size. The share of food companies without FS system was five times higher in small compared to big companies. No effect of FS management level or riskiness level on FS climate scores was apparent. Food companies seemed to avoid problems in cooperation and trust between FS leaders and other employees, since they have perceived FS climate similarly. The strongest FS climate segmentation in Central and Eastern Europe food companies was observed in terms of the EU membership status. EU operating food companies managed to develop a very good and distinctive FS climate, with better-perceived leadership, communication, commitment, resources and risk awareness than non-EU food companies. Transitional economic environment of non-EU countries have undesirably influenced the organisational and technological support in their companies and employees perceptions of FS climate.en_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFood Controlen_US
dc.subjectFood safety climateen_US
dc.subjectNational cultureen_US
dc.subjectFood safety cultureen_US
dc.subjectFood safety management systemsen_US
dc.subjectHACCPen_US
dc.subjectEastern Europeen_US
dc.subjectCentral Europeen_US
dc.titleComprehensive insight into the food safety climate in Central and Eastern Europeen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107238-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0956713520301547?httpAccept=text/xml-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0956713520301547?httpAccept=text/plain-
dc.identifier.volume114-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Veterinary Medicine: Journal Articles
Прикажи едноставен запис

Page view(s)

49
checked on 20.7.2025

Google ScholarTM

Проверете

Altmetric


Записите во DSpace се заштитени со авторски права, со сите права задржани, освен ако не е поинаку наведено.