Ве молиме користете го овој идентификатор да го цитирате или поврзете овој запис:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/17477
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ana Kaftandzieva | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zhaklina Cekovska | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Igor Kaftandziev | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Milena Petrovska | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nikola Panovski | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-19T11:50:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-19T11:50:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Kaftandzieva A, Cekovska Zh, Kaftandziev I, Petrovska M, Panovski N. Bacteriology of Wound - Clinical Utility of Gram Stain Microscopy and the Correlation with Culture. Maced J Med Sci. 2012 Mar 15; 5(1):72-77 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/17477 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: To determine the most common bacteria isolated from wound specimens and to compare those culture results to Gram stain slides. Material and methods: A total of 1970 specimens from 1788 patients, treated in the University Clinics in Skopje during a one year period were examined by standard microbiology techniques (inoculation onto standard agar media and direct Gram-stained smears). Automatized Vitek system was used for identification of all anaerobes. Results: Out of a total of 1970 specimens, 1094 (55.5 %) were positive by culture. A total of 1462 strains were isolated: 753 Gram positive (Gram+), 661 Gram negative (Gram-) and 48 anaerobic bacteria. The number of specimens yielding one, two or more different strains was 788, 244 and 62, respectively. Gram + bacteria, in 44.7 % of positive samples were a single isolate. The most commonly isolated potential pathogen was Staphylococcus. In 23.7% samples, Gram negative bacteria were a single isolate (E. coli was the most common isolate). 1094 specimens were positive by culture, 419 (38.3%) were positive by both culture and Gram stain and 675 (61.7%) were negative by Gram stain (leukocytes were present in 276 specimens). 876 specimens were negative by culture, 789 (90%) were negative by both culture and Gram stain (leukocytes were present in 271 specimen) and 87 (9.9%) were positive only by Gram stain. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated only a 38.3 % of microbiological correlation between Gram stain and culture. This data makes the clinical utility of Gram stain for the microbiological analysis of wounds questionable. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject | wound | en_US |
dc.subject | Gram stain slide | en_US |
dc.title | Bacteriology of Wound - Clinical Utility of Gram Stain Microscopy and the Correlation with Culture | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Faculty of Medicine | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Faculty of Medicine | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Faculty of Medicine | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Faculty of Medicine | - |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Опис | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MJMS-2012-Article.pdf | 89.43 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
228
checked on 29.3.2025
Download(s)
92
checked on 29.3.2025
Google ScholarTM
Проверете
Записите во DSpace се заштитени со авторски права, со сите права задржани, освен ако не е поинаку наведено.