Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/17477
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAna Kaftandzievaen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhaklina Cekovskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorIgor Kaftandzieven_US
dc.contributor.authorMilena Petrovskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNikola Panovskien_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T11:50:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-19T11:50:49Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-
dc.identifier.citationKaftandzieva A, Cekovska Zh, Kaftandziev I, Petrovska M, Panovski N. Bacteriology of Wound - Clinical Utility of Gram Stain Microscopy and the Correlation with Culture. Maced J Med Sci. 2012 Mar 15; 5(1):72-77en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/17477-
dc.description.abstractAim: To determine the most common bacteria isolated from wound specimens and to compare those culture results to Gram stain slides. Material and methods: A total of 1970 specimens from 1788 patients, treated in the University Clinics in Skopje during a one year period were examined by standard microbiology techniques (inoculation onto standard agar media and direct Gram-stained smears). Automatized Vitek system was used for identification of all anaerobes. Results: Out of a total of 1970 specimens, 1094 (55.5 %) were positive by culture. A total of 1462 strains were isolated: 753 Gram positive (Gram+), 661 Gram negative (Gram-) and 48 anaerobic bacteria. The number of specimens yielding one, two or more different strains was 788, 244 and 62, respectively. Gram + bacteria, in 44.7 % of positive samples were a single isolate. The most commonly isolated potential pathogen was Staphylococcus. In 23.7% samples, Gram negative bacteria were a single isolate (E. coli was the most common isolate). 1094 specimens were positive by culture, 419 (38.3%) were positive by both culture and Gram stain and 675 (61.7%) were negative by Gram stain (leukocytes were present in 276 specimens). 876 specimens were negative by culture, 789 (90%) were negative by both culture and Gram stain (leukocytes were present in 271 specimen) and 87 (9.9%) were positive only by Gram stain. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated only a 38.3 % of microbiological correlation between Gram stain and culture. This data makes the clinical utility of Gram stain for the microbiological analysis of wounds questionable.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMacedonian Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectwounden_US
dc.subjectGram stain slideen_US
dc.titleBacteriology of Wound - Clinical Utility of Gram Stain Microscopy and the Correlation with Cultureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MJMS-2012-Article.pdf89.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

156
checked on May 5, 2024

Download(s)

65
checked on May 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.