Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/16498
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDimitar Veljanovskien_US
dc.contributor.authorBiljana Prgovaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMasa Kostovaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniela Ristikj-Stomnaroskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSandra Dejanovaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVioleta Vasilevska Nikodinovskaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T09:05:50Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-11T09:05:50Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn2545-4706-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/16498-
dc.description.abstractCT-guided periradicular therapy (PRT) is a minimally invasive interventional technique for treatment of chronic lumbar pain. Aim: To investigate importance of pain duration before PRT treatment in patients with chronic lumbar pain and radiculopathy, with clinical effectiveness assessment. A prospective follow-up CT guided PRT study was done in 166 patients divided into 4 groups according duration of pain before intervention (<3 months, 4-6months, 7-12months, >1year). Degree of pain intensity was determined according to VAS scale. Improvement degree was excellent, good, moderate, or weak.Good clinical response was defined when improvement is greater or equal to 50% on VAS scale, and functional improvement was equal to 40% in the reduction of the ODI index. Follow-up was done at 2nd weeks, 3 and 6 months. Good response was observed in 51.8% of the cases after 2 weeks, 54.2% after 3 months and 59% after 6 months. ODI index parameters was greater or equal to 40% in 22.2% after 2 weeks, 13.8% after 3 months, and 8.4% after 6 months. After 6 months in patients with pain duration up to 3 months, the improvement was excellent in 41(74.5%), moderate in 3(5.4%), good in 6(10.9%) and weak in 4(7.2%) patients in contrast to patients with pain over one year who showed excellent improvement in only 2(5.7%) patients, moderate in 11(31.4%), good in 6(17.1%) and weak in 16 (45.7%) patients. PRT is clinically effective with better clinical outcomein patients with shorter duration of symptoms.en_US
dc.publisherMacedonian Association of Anatomistsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Morphological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectchronic lumbar painen_US
dc.subjectradiculopathyen_US
dc.subjectCT guideden_US
dc.subjectinterventionalen_US
dc.subjectsteroidsen_US
dc.titleIMPORTANCE OF PAIN DURATION PRIOR PAIN RELIEF TREATMENT WITH CT-GUIDED PERIRADICULAR THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LUMBAR PAINen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IMPORTANCE OF PAIN DURATION PRIOR PAIN RELIEF TREATMENT.pdf467.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

51
checked on Sep 22, 2024

Download(s)

20
checked on Sep 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.