Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/15618
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorValentina Koevskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorErieta Nikolic-Dimitrovaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBiljana Mitrevskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCvetanka Gjerakaroska-Savevskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarija Gocevskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBilajna Kalcovskaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T11:20:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-13T11:20:17Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-20-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/15618-
dc.description.abstractOsteoarthritis is a rheumatic disease characterized by degeneration and decay of cartilage in the joints. As the disease worsens, the joint space narrows causing numbness and pain, which often impairs movement. In addition to pharmacological therapy, low-intensity laser (LILT), high-intensity laser (HILT) and exercise are used to treat osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. HILT is a new modality in our country and the experience from its application is small, especially in the treatment of OA of the knee. Aim of the paper was to compare the effect of HILT with LILT in the treatment of OA of the knee. Material and methods: This was a randomized comparative unilateral blind study involving 72 patients divided into two groups. The first group was treated with HILT, the second group treated with LILT. Outcome measure was the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, which was made on the first and tenth day of treatment. Statistical significance was defined as p <0.05. Results: We found a significant difference between the two groups in terms of VAS score after 10 therapies in favor to a significantly lower score, that is, less pain in the HILT group (p = 0.0035). The comparison of the VAS score between the two times in the two groups separately showed that in both, the HILT and the LILT groups, the VAS score after 10 days of therapy was significantly lower compared to thatat 0 time, for consequently p = 0.00001vsp = 0.00001. Conclusion: Treatment with HILT and LILT significantly reduces pain and stiffness in patients with OA. Patients treated with HILT had better results, i.e., had a significant reduction in pain than patients treated with LILT. HILT was more effective than LILT.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Public Health of Republic of Macedonia = Институт за јавно здравје на Република Македонијаen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Public Health = Архиви на јавното здравјеen_US
dc.subjecthigh-intensity laseren_US
dc.subjectlow-intensity laseren_US
dc.subjectknee osteoarthritisen_US
dc.subjectVAS scaleen_US
dc.titleAPPLICATION OF HIGH-INTENSITY LASER IN PAIN TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITISen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doiDOI.ORG/10.3889/APH.2021.6008-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
koevska.pdf285.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

86
checked on Apr 26, 2024

Download(s)

26
checked on Apr 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.