Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/14701
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSelim, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorStojcheva Taneva, Oen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrozdanovski, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorIvanovski, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorStamatov, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T08:43:59Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-16T08:43:59Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/14701-
dc.description.abstractAbstract Hemodialysis is generally performed three times per week, a treatment prescription not based on optimizing the physiology of the normal kidney, thence most hemodialysis patients are, even when treated “adequately” according to current standards, exposed to the so-called unphysiology of dialysis. Standard hemodialysis (HD) is efficient, but intermittent, by contrast, peritonael dialysis generally is continuous, but inefficient. Daily HD is both frequent and efficient and theoretically should be superior to other forms of dialysis for renal replacement therapy. Daily HD has been defined primarily by treatment time and categorized as 1) short daily HD with 6 or more treatments per week and lasts 1.5 – 3.0 h per session and 2) long slow nocturnal daily HD with 6 nights/week and the duration of each session of 6-8 h. Daily HD has been associated with improvements in many outcomes, including blood pressure control, left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac performance, renal anaemia, hyperphosphatemia control, nutritional state, quality of life and good patient and vascular access survival. The potential problems with daily HD are: logistic (social), economic and medical (deficiency syndromes and blood access). There are no known contra-indications to daily HD. Daily HD represents one of the most revolutionary concepts in the present dialysis treatment, by changing the ratio between duration and frequency of treatment. To assume that 10 – 15 % of standard HD patients could benefit from daily HD. Although experience is still limited, interest is enhanced by positive reports, from all studys.en_US
dc.publisherМакедонско лекарско друштво = Macedonian medical associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofМакедонски медицински преглед = Macedonian medical reviewen_US
dc.titleДневна в.с. стандардна интермитентна хемодијализаen_US
dc.title.alternativeDaily versus standard intermittent hemodialysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

41
checked on Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.