Ве молиме користете го овој идентификатор да го цитирате или поврзете овој запис: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/12702
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClaeys, M Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoubille, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorCasella, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorZukermann, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorNikolaou, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Luca, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorGierlotka, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorIakobishvili, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorThiele, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoutouzis, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorSionis, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorBeauloye, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorHeld, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorTint, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorZakke, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorSerpytis, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorBabic, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorBelohlavev, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorMagdy, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorSivagowry Rasalingam, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorDaly, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorArroyo, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorVavlukis, Marijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRadovanovic, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrendafilova, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorMarandi, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorHassenger, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorLettino, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorBonnefoy, Een_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-22T21:48:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-22T21:48:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-24-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/12702-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The present survey aims to describe the intensive cardiac care unit organization and admission policies in Europe. Methods: A total of 228 hospitals (61% academic) from 27 countries participated in this survey. In addition to the organizational aspects of the intensive cardiac care units, including classification of the intensive cardiac care unit levels, data on the admission diagnoses were gathered from consecutive patients who were admitted during a two-day period. Admission policies were evaluated by comparing illness severity with the intensive cardiac care unit level. Gross national income was used to differentiate high-income countries (n=13) from middle-income countries (n=14). Results: A total of 98% of the hospitals had an intensive cardiac care unit: 70% had a level 1 intensive cardiac care unit, 76% had a level 2 intensive cardiac care unit, 51% had a level 3 intensive cardiac care unit, and 60% of the hospitals had more than one intensive cardiac care unit level. High-income countries tended to have more level 3 intensive cardiac care units than middle-income countries (55% versus 41%, p=0.07). A total of 5159 admissions were scored on illness severity: 63% were low severity, 24% were intermediate severity, and 12% were high severity. Patients with low illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, whereas patients with high illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 2 and 3 intensive cardiac care units. A policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; some patients with high illness severity were admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more often in middle-income countries, whereas some patients with low illness severity were admitted to level 3 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more frequently in high-income countries. Conclusion: More than one-third of the admitted patients were considered intermediate or high risk. Although patients with higher illness severity were mostly admitted to high-level intensive cardiac care units, an admission policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; this mismatch was partly related to insufficient logistic intensive cardiac care unit capacity.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular careen_US
dc.subjectIntensive cardiac care unit; acute cardiovascular care; admission policy; organizationen_US
dc.titleOrganization of intensive cardiac care units in Europe: Results of a multinational surveyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi8-
dc.identifier.doihttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2048872619883997-
dc.identifier.doihttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/2048872619883997-
dc.identifier.doihttp://academic.oup.com/ehjacc/article-pdf/9/8/993/36166288/ehjacc0993.pdf-
dc.identifier.doihttp://academic.oup.com/ehjacc/article-pdf/9/8/993/36166288/ehjacc0993.pdf-
dc.identifier.doi9-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2048872619883997-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2048872619883997-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/2048872619883997-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://academic.oup.com/ehjacc/article-pdf/9/8/993/36166288/ehjacc0993.pdf-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://academic.oup.com/ehjacc/article-pdf/9/8/993/36166288/ehjacc0993.pdf-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue8-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Прикажи едноставен запис

Page view(s)

270
checked on 21.7.2025

Download(s)

67
checked on 21.7.2025

Google ScholarTM

Проверете

Altmetric


Записите во DSpace се заштитени со авторски права, со сите права задржани, освен ако не е поинаку наведено.