Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/11153
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorde Beaufort, Carine Een_US
dc.contributor.authorSwift, Peter G Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorSkinner, Chas Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorAanstoot, Henk Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorAman, Janen_US
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Fergusen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartul, Pedroen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiarelli, Francescoen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaneman, Dennisen_US
dc.contributor.authorDanne, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorDorchy, Harryen_US
dc.contributor.authorHoey, Hilaryen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaprio, Eero Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaufman, Francineen_US
dc.contributor.authorKocova, Mirjanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMortensen, Henrik Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorNjølstad, Pal Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorPhillip, Mosheen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Kenneth Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchoenle, Eugen Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorUrakami, Tatsuhikoen_US
dc.contributor.authorVanelli, Maurizioen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-22T13:08:29Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-22T13:08:29Z-
dc.date.issued2007-09-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/11153-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE—To reevaluate the persistence and stability of previously observed differences between pediatric diabetes centers and to investigate the influence of demography, language communication problems, and changes in insulin regimens on metabolic outcome, hypoglycemia, and ketoacidosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This was an observational cross-sectional international study in 21 centers, with clinical data obtained from all participants and A1C levels assayed in one central laboratory. All individuals with diabetes aged 11–18 years (49.4% female), with duration of diabetes of at least 1 year, were invited to participate. Fourteen of the centers participated in previous Hvidoere Studies, allowing direct comparison of glycemic control across centers between 1998 and 2005. RESULTS—Mean A1C was 8.2 ± 1.4%, with substantial variation between centers (mean A1C range 7.4–9.2%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between centers in rates of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. Language difficulties had a significant negative impact on metabolic outcome (A1C 8.5 ± 2.0% vs. 8.2 ± 1.4% for those with language difficulties vs. those without, respectively; P < 0.05). After adjustement for significant confounders of age, sex, duration of diabetes, insulin regimen, insulin dose, BMI, and language difficulties, the center differences persisted, and the effect size for center was not reduced. Relative center ranking since 1998 has remained stable, with no significant change in A1C. CONCLUSIONS—Despite many changes in diabetes management, major differences in metabolic outcome between 21 international pediatric diabetes centers persist. Different application between centers in the implementation of insulin treatment appears to be of more importance and needs further exploration.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Diabetes Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDiabetes Careen_US
dc.titleContinuing stability of center differences in pediatric diabetes care: do advances in diabetes treatment improve outcome? The Hvidoere Study Group on Childhood Diabetesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2337/dc07-0475-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue9-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on May 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.