Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/11138
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMargarita Penevaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrijana Gjorgjeskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVladimir Ginoskien_US
dc.contributor.authorHristina Breshkovskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoza Dzoleva Tolevskaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-22T11:55:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-22T11:55:30Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/11138-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Electrosurgery is widely used in surgical procedures, but mainly for subcutaneous and deep layer dissections. The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate the results of routine use of electrosurgical microneedle in performing skin incisions in the facial regions. Material and methods: Eighty patients with both benign and malignant skin lesions in the facial regions undergoing surgery were enrolled in this study. In group A comprising 40 patients, cold steel surgical scalpel ?15 was used for the surgical procedure. Electrosurgical microneedle with 0.06 mm tip radius and generator unit KLS Martin Electrosurgical Unit ME MB 2 set on cutting mode, power 12 W was used for performing the surgery in group B including the same number of patients. Differences between incision time, excision time, blood loss and the wound related complications were evaluated. Results: The two groups did not significantly differ in the speed of incision and speed of excision although both the speed of incision and the speed of excision were found to be slightly faster in the electrosurgery group. There was significantly less blood loss in the electrosurgery group compared with the scalpel group.Statistical analysis did not confirm as significant the difference in complications between the two groups although most of the complications were associated with the patients operated with scalpel. Conclusion: Electrosurgery presents safe and effective way of work. In that manner, it is very important to choose the right generator unit's settings and the right type of electrode.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAssociation of Medical Doctors Sanameden_US
dc.relation.ispartofSANAMEDen_US
dc.subjectsurgical scalpelen_US
dc.subjectelectrosurgeryen_US
dc.subjectfacial regionsen_US
dc.titleELECTROSURGICAL MICRONEEDLE VERSUS SCALPEL SKIN INCISIONS IN THE FACIAL REGIONen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.24125/sanamed.v13i3.267-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://sanamed.rs/OJS/index.php/Sanamed/article/download/267/142-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue3-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
267-1526-1-PB.pdf93.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

68
checked on Oct 10, 2024

Download(s)

15
checked on Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.