Ве молиме користете го овој идентификатор да го цитирате или поврзете овој запис: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10705
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChai-Adisaksopha, Chatreeen_US
dc.contributor.authorIorio, Alfonsoen_US
dc.contributor.authorCrowther, Mark A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorde Miguel, Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorSalgado, Estuardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarija Zdraveskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMonreal, Manuelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-08T11:59:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-08T11:59:20Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12-03-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10705-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is considered to be an anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. The duration of treatment is recommended to maintain at least 3-6 months after the diagnosis. However, the data on continuing LMWH treatment beyond six months remains unclear. <jats:p>Methods: Consecutive cancer-associated thrombosis patients who were enrolled in RIETE Registry were evaluated. We systematically selected the patients who completed treatment with LMWH for 6 months. The patients were divided into two groups whether they continued to receive LMWH or switched to warfarin. The main outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding and total bleeding. Survival curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier method and the curves were compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Cox-proportional hazard (PH) model. Outcomes: of the 1,502 eligible patients who completed 6-month anticoagulant therapy, 763 patients continued to received LMWH and 739 switched to warfarin. There was no significant difference in terms of recurrent VTE between two study groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.44-1.02, p=0.06), Figure 1. The cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 2.6% in LMWH group and 2.7% in warfarin group (HR 1.05, 95%CI; 0.79-1.55, p=0.79), Figure 2. The cumulative incidence of total bleeding was 6.7% in LMWH group and 7.0% in warfarin group (HR 0.92, 95%CI; 0.62-1.37, p=0.70). Conclusions: In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis who completed 6-month of anticoagulation therapy, switching to warfarin is not associated with increase in recurrent VTE, major bleeding or total bleeding when compared to continuing LMWH. Warfarin is an acceptable alternative anticoagulant in cancer-associated thrombosis patients who do not tolerate long-term treatment with LMWH.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Hematologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBlooden_US
dc.titleSwitching to Warfarin after 6-Month Completion of Anticoagulant Treatment for Cancer-Associated Thrombosisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1182/blood.v126.23.430.430-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ashpublications.org/blood/article/126/23/430/135754/Switching-to-Warfarin-after-6Month-Completion-of-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ashpublications.org/blood/article/126/23/430/135754/Switching-to-Warfarin-after-6Month-Completion-of-
dc.identifier.volume126-
dc.identifier.issue23-
dc.identifier.fpage430-
dc.identifier.lpage430-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Прикажи едноставен запис

Page view(s)

49
checked on 3.7.2025

Google ScholarTM

Проверете

Altmetric


Записите во DSpace се заштитени со авторски права, со сите права задржани, освен ако не е поинаку наведено.