Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10294
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarnitz, Simoneen_US
dc.contributor.authorLukarski, Duskoen_US
dc.contributor.authorKöhler, Christhardten_US
dc.contributor.authorWlodarczyk, Waldemaren_US
dc.contributor.authorEbert, Andreasen_US
dc.contributor.authorBudach, Volkeren_US
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Achimen_US
dc.contributor.authorStromberger, Carmenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T11:12:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-25T11:12:48Z-
dc.date.issued2011-10-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10294-
dc.description.abstractTo compare intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivered by helical tomotherapy (HT) with conventional IMRT for primary chemoradiation in cervical cancer patients.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physicsen_US
dc.subjectCervical canceren_US
dc.subjectSmall bowel irradiationen_US
dc.subjectHelical tomotherapyen_US
dc.subjectIntensity-modulated radiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectConformityen_US
dc.subjectHomogeneityen_US
dc.titleHelical tomotherapy versus conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary chemoradiation in cervical cancer patients: an intraindividual comparisonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.005-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0360301610008060?httpAccept=text/xml-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0360301610008060?httpAccept=text/plain-
dc.identifier.volume81-
dc.identifier.issue2-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on May 7, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.