Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10291
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDejan Spasovskien_US
dc.contributor.authorSonja Genadieva-Stavricen_US
dc.contributor.authorTatjana Sotirovaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSlavica Subevska-Stratrovaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJulijana Brezovska-Kavrakovaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T10:38:57Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-25T10:38:57Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn0025-1097-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10291-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Very often late diagnosis in spondylitis ankylosans (SA) in the period between 5 to 10 years is due to unstandardized diagnostic method besides established diagnostic criteria. But, they are very restrictive and not practical for early diagnosis of SAbecause they are based on proved radiographic changes. Aim. Sacroiliitis (SI) as a sole entity rarely exists, usually is a part of the diagnostic mosaic of SA and related spondyloarthropathies (SpA). Surely proved SI clinically and radiographically means sure diagnosis of SA, especially in the early stage of the disease. Methods. A highly selective group of patients with SA was followed in the period of one year: group of 23 patients (pts) with unconvincing radiographic changes for SA from 1-2 ° and group of 21 pts without radiographic changes i.e. 0°. Beside SA, both groups fulfilled at least another from the listed conditions: 1.oligoarthritis; 2. enthesitis; 3. iridocyclitis; 4. positive family history for SA; 5. positive antigen HLA-B27 and 6. elevated ESR > 30mm/h. Results. After one-year observational period 11/21 pts in group A were with SA. In group B only 6/23 pts were with SA; the others were transformed in different directions: 4/23 in the group of spondyloarthropathies (SpA)-2 pts with psoriatic spondyloarthropathy (PsSpA), 1 patient with Reiter syndrome (RS) and 1 patient with entericspondyloarthropathy (ESpA). The remaining 8/22 pts were still undefined SpA. Conclusion. Our results showed that defining of SA was crucial in the diagnosis of SA. The fact that most of the cases with authentic SA were in group A with minimal radiographic changes from 1-2° in comparison with group B without radiographic changes showed the necessity of using other imaging techniques (scan, MRI) for earlier detection of SI in the so called preradiographic stage which lasts 2-4 years, when radiographic findings are absent. Clinical (symptomatic) SI without radiographic changes according to the findings of pts in group B gives a possibility for overlap to other entities in the group of SpA.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren_US
dc.relation.ispartofМакедонски медицински преглед = Macedonian Medical Reviewen_US
dc.subjectspondyloarthropathiesen_US
dc.subjectsacroiliitisen_US
dc.subjectspondylitis ankylosansen_US
dc.titleSIGNIFICANCE OF IN EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF SPONDYLOARTHROPATHYen_US
dc.title.alternativeЗНАЧЕЊЕ НА САКРОИЛЕИТИС ВО РАНАТА ДИЈАГНОЗА НА СПОНДИЛОАРТРОПАТИИen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume73-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.fpage164-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MMP201973(3).pdf2.94 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

99
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Download(s)

38
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.