Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10006
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorD. Gudeva Nikovskaen_US
dc.contributor.authorF. Tozijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. GJorgjeven_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-05T09:31:53Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-05T09:31:53Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12188/10006-
dc.description.abstractAnalysis of good governance in public health sector in RM was performed by developing and applying an instrument for evaluation of 10 essential public health functions (EPHF) that are responsibility of health authorities, in order to identify ‘grey zones’ and provide recommendations and directions for improvement. The analysis has been performed using the standardized questionnaire developed by US CDC & PAHO, translated and adapted to be used in Macedonian context. The instrument incorporates 11 EPHF and outlines 49 indicators that are evaluated through answers on questions for measures and submeasures in the defined area. The survey was performed in three stages: translation of the instrument, pre-testing on representative sample of government officials and necessary adaptations made to be used in Macedonian context; interviews with three groups of respondents—central government officials, representatives of government institutions at local level and representatives of NGO and Summary of the results and preparation of final report, including recommendations for remedial activities. Analysis of EPHF#10 Public Health Research shows ‘minimum performance’ by all three groups of respondents. There is partially developed public health research agenda, and key stakeholders are only exceptionally involved in research. There is existing research capacity, but lacking is interdisciplinary approach, regular evaluation of the research priorities, transparency in results dissemination and sharing of results with those concerned with the problem. In the subsequent SWAT analysis, activities for development of institutional capacity for PH research are identified as strength, weakness is in the absence of the agenda for PH research, while threats, or the biggest ‘gray zone’ to be addressed by the health authorities are seen in decision making that is not evidence based.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Public Health, Vol. 19, Supplement 1, 2009en_US
dc.titlePublic Health Research in Republic of Macedonia as an essential public health functionen_US
dc.typeProceeding articleen_US
dc.relation.conference17th Annual EUPHA Meeting: Parallel Session 5, Friday 27 November 2009en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptFaculty of Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine: Conference papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ckp504.pdf1.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

76
checked on May 17, 2024

Download(s)

80
checked on May 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.